Year: 2002
Genre: Action, Adventure, Fantasy
Starring: Hayden Christensen, Natalie Portman, Ewan McGregor
Director: George Lucas
Genre: Action, Adventure, Fantasy
Starring: Hayden Christensen, Natalie Portman, Ewan McGregor
Director: George Lucas
|
Review: Sitting in the dark? EJ theater, the popcorn? Goal in one hand and a glass of cola in the other, I dream? Desperately il dr? Let bitterness and cynicism that communication was terrible billion - Episode I toy boo? il into my brain. But it was useless. John Williams conducting score nostalgia wonderful shivers up your spine and at the time scroller faded? Information to a distant yellow colored salvation was lost in the heady fog fanboy love.Sadly, it did not last. After a short set, we get to? first look at Anakin MK. 2 Nila u? provocative cheerful Jake Lloyd, was transformed into the making? for Vader-charisma into the vortex that is supremely untalented Hayden Christensen. Consistently acted out according to the protocols wood fireplace scene, Christensen walks around to say anything more, right? I focus you? large remember my next?? ie cue. In fact, hes so sad? E vacuums? Even of life generally? Live Ewan MacGregor, who seems like he became disillusioned with Lucas as increas? Ok from us . Portman handles quite well, and as Mace Windu, Samuel L. Jackson makes the usual schtick that was weve seen in the? etkom else. Even Christopher Lee took off as a threat, mo? But because? E vac? Ina his scenes consist of sitting against a green screen - is about? Emetná e thing? Most experienced te I believe the actors.The direction, the? is lame. Some of the action scenes (eg persecution ignited? Whether in a vehicle, using a futuristic city at the outset) to go too? long and become tedious reel for CGI department ILMS, although people give? teenagers cut terribly short (especially the battle scene Obi-Wan/Jango Fett, we had something fanboys drooling over before the film). The fight scenes computer animation simply throw in? Ade, and hope? Viewers will e duly impressed, though the effect is the same as in? Fireworks all in the same place time - big shots and a lot of color, but nothing to focus on.The film speed is it? alostná. Love scene scáileáni take up too? a lot of time - something that should not be a? so bad if the result had chemistry and electricity of wet cement - also potential catharsis occurs municipality Anakins Sand People kill off the camera! Incredibly the last pieces were about? Être in? All the other characters talk about something really <i> really interesting </ i> is happening on the screen of the network. Show do not tell, LUCAS! Even the director lousiest know that.So many bad things so? E few words to say in Watto back, except incredibly stereotype urghrá? The Jewish? Kareda (big nose, long white hair, black hat rabbi). 3-CPO and R2 Browse film whose service? Well? ANY sense at all. The dialogue is atrocious and jokes are the mountains? Ie. If CGI is so big these days, why is it that obvious? Good things? Few and far between depressed. The Scene sticks worked pretty well died, was thin white air? Ny wonderful strangers and start watching in? Yoda all kinds of ass doing a battle scene with Christopher Lee Star Wars is only satisfying moment? of ALL time. Ever. Never, never, never. But to focus on? IARU second (bit only in Episode II really account? Temporary), but not? Ikovný amateur garbage? Increas e? Ok movie.I a think? worst e? ie Epsiode II declares? e Lucas is really just a hack. Kaufman Kasdan or without hard labor? Of ALL, or pick up the slack re Spielberg? Ijné, but Lucas is a big stupid boy tell silly stories. If Episode II is next? Teenagers sci-fi series, I'd just excruciatingly awful film to watch. But how else?? Next step in the ongoing mission to destroy the legend Lucas and the Star Wars universe than can? Em just give my utter contempt.
No comments:
Post a Comment